Since the advent of the Trump administration, American progressives have been aghast at its narrow, nationalist approach to world affairs.  But many of them are also uneasy at the American establishment's defense of its more traditional foreign policy, which was characterized by U.S.-dominated military alliances, soaring Pentagon budgets, and numerous wars.  A more satisfying alternative involves strengthening global governance, which has enormous potential for addressing current world problems.

The progressive income tax has existed since 1861 in the United States, and is designed to ensure that the richest Americans pay their fair share of the cost of maintaining their country's public programs.  But the wealthy deeply resented paying a portion of their income to benefit other people.  As a result, since the early 1960s they have succeeded in having their taxes dramatically reduced.  Even so, large majorities of Americans favor raising taxes on the rich -- a policy that would shift the tax burden back to the wealthy and, also, improve the overall economy.

The recent victory of 28-year-old Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez -- an obscure, upfront democratic socialist from the Bronx -- in a Democratic primary against one of the most powerful Democrats in the House of Representatives should not be a total surprise.  In recent years, democratic socialism has been making a remarkable comeback in American life and, as the 2016 Bernie Sanders campaign illustrated, has begun to play a significant role in Democratic party politics.

Buried far below the mass media coverage of the U.S.-North Korea summit spectacle, Donald Trump -- assisted by his military and civilian advisors -- is busy getting the United States ready for nuclear war.  A massive nuclear weapons buildup now underway (at a potential cost of $2 trillion), new nuclear policy guidelines widening the scope for the use of nuclear weapons, and a high level of mental instability, impulsiveness, and vindictiveness on the part of the U.S. commander-in-chief combine to create a giant step toward catastrophe.

Although Daniel Ellsberg is best known for revealing the Pentagon Papers to the American people, he spent much of his 13-year career as a military analyst at the highest levels of the U.S. national security apparatus, grappling with the life and death issues posed by nuclear weapons.  Therefore, when an insider like this tells us how preparations for nuclear war have been proceeding, it's well worth sitting up and taking notice.    

A 2018 study of the opinions of people living in 156 nations found that none of the "great" powers -- all of which have portrayed themselves as models for the world -- ranked within the top ten.  In fact, the United States placed 18th, Russia 59th, and China 86th.  The factors that appear to have contributed most to national happiness were advanced social welfare institutions and a relatively low level of violence.  

In February 2018, the GOP-controlled Congress passed and President Donald Trump signed legislation that increased U.S. military spending by $165 billion over the next two years.  Remarkably, though, a Gallup poll, conducted only days before, found that only 33 percent of Americans favored increasing military spending, while 65 percent opposed it.  Even more remarkable for a nation where military spending has grown substantially over the decades, in only one of the past 49 years when Gallup polled Americans about military spending did a majority of Americans favor increasing it.

When Donald Trump was running for the presidency, he promised that, if he was elected, "American worker[s] will finally have a president who will protect them and fight for them."  Today, though, safely ensconced in the White House, President Trump is leading a fierce campaign against American workers -- one that  is undermining their health and safety, lowering their wages, and weakening their unions.

In today's United States, many Americans accord an exalted status to anyone serving in the U.S. armed forces.  But this across-the-board hero-worship of soldiers is a fairly recent phenomenon, and is not merited or conducive to the survival of a democratic society.